Jul 162008

I think it is fantastic when creative people, who have been traditionally forced by scarcity of distribution and BIG media stranglehold on markets to play by others rules, start to forge their own future regardless of corporations. Known as the Queen of the Indies in the UK (thanks Paul Bennun for that label) Imogen Heap is showing how professional music may be made in the future.

I have been tracking her rise to ‘social music making’ stardom since she was at the BRIT School back in 1993 and I was her class tutor and studio production teacher. She was one of a handful of young and talented individuals lucky enough to get the backing of the establishment, Record Industry Trust, in this ‘fame’ school. Since then she has sold millions of albums, done soundtracks on Narnia, Shrek, Golden State etc and is now constructing her 3rd solo album (the 2nd was as a duo called Frou Frou) in the gaze of her adoring fans in YouTube vlogs.

She is up to episode 26 with many getting 30-40k view but more importantly gets 200-300 comments per post. Imogen is now into the actual music creation block (after quite a few of the early vlogs being about her building a new studio) and I was inspired to write this post because of the opening sequence episode 26 which shone out like a blinding light. We suddenly have the inklings of collaboration with the fans during the actual conception of the songs – Imogen actually is reading and responding to comments received via YouTube or privately.

OK this has happened before with TV/Film and music but what may seem to some to be a small change to the song based on a few passing comments has enormous implications for the way ‘higher production value’ brands and products should be thinking about its relationship with consumers – here is a live, real time incarnation of that. Imogen changing the product based on wisdom of the crowds input.

I encourage you to track Imogen as this album is created in the next few months leading up to the sale at the end of the year. It really is a very useful model of the way ‘producers’ of any content should be engaging with its audience. Don’t you think? Letters on a post card to this address…:)

Apr 212007

360 Award Winners
YAY! Jackie my LAMP cohort and Paul Bennun (a new LAMP mentor on the next lab in Tas) won their development awards categories! more later…Writing this on various jetlagged Europe to Australia plane hops so excuse any fragmentation of style – will be tidying and adding links and speakers quotations (to bring it to life) when I get back to Oz, compiling them on the last leg from Bangkok to Sydney. This is actually posted from the surreal Bangkok international sci-fi tube airport in a bleary haze from the previous cramped eleven hour flight (OK enough boring travel detail)…

This final full day looked on the surface like my ideal conference agenda 😉 Thanks Ferhan. So a delectable mix of seminars like social tools driving formats, virtual worlds (keynote, brands) and games in cross-media entertainment amongst many others! So how did it live up to expectation? First though a few comments about the Ashley and Jana double act the previous evening before Emmys…

BBC Keynote – Focus on-demand

Jana Bennett “We need to be ahead of the audience not behind them, The conversation can be creative, two way and in many cases multi-way. And we are witnessing new creative possibilities open up when many of these ripples bump against each other”

I am not sure what has happened since last year when Ashley gave a rundown of the many and various activities across BBC New Media including the latest broadband and broadcast interactive ‘TV-forms’, interesting new services such as the subtle ARG Jamie Kane (is it real or not) right through to a whole bunch of participatory aspirational and delivered online content. This year though it seemed to be Jana Bennett (Director, BBC Vision) talking broadly about embracing viewer created content and Ashley Highfield, (Director of Future Media & Technology) focussing wholey on BBC on-demand – whether via the iPlayer or a beta timeshifted interface for a forthcoming DTT, PDR (Personal Digital Recorder – wish they would use that rather than a DVR or PVR, which stresses video).

Ashley Highfield “Coming to a platform agnostic device near you soon. Our trials show that the BBC IPlayer counts for 10% more of BBC TV viewing in broadband homes…with this level of nascent demand we want to make BBC iPlayer as widely available as possible across as many platforms as is feasible. Were starting with the biggest available audience the 22 million who are broadband connected in Britain, The next biggest audience will be the 3 million cable homes. After that its Max, Media Centres, smart handheld devices and once we’ve done all of that we are going to turn to the really tricky platforms like digital terrestrial using PVRs or internet hybrid boxes”

Anyway so a little dissapointing from a ‘innovation’ perspective but encouraging as finally a culture of manifesting the TV-Anytime vision (which was not really about standards but about the many rich services that broadcast and broadband delivered audio visual enable – just wish people would read the flippin’ business models documents for phase 1 and 2, cause it covers virtually everything I saw at Milia when function, form, creativity and business models are discussed around on-demand (especially personalisation, mobile PDRs and targeted ads). Anyway, a long way to go it seems for the BBC as the 1000 clips/programmes is not a big enough pot yet to try the really cool stuff, such as ‘Buried Alive’ from last year. Hats off to Phil Jay and others for producing a nice carousel interface for the BBC PDR, subtle hints of Dale Herigstad work and even the very first Digital Text prototype I made that had a genre carousel selector – but that was nine years ago 😉

Back to the final full day. I attended in post Emmy wobblyness a Marc Canter breakfast. Marc is sold as a “techno rabble rouser, with an operatic voice”. In 1984, he co-founded MacroMind, which became Macromedia in 1991 but that is long, long ago. We had an informal chat with croissants and coffee, before his talk and it became a trip down memory lane of using Macs at the dawn of interactive creation, made me and a couple of others involved feel very old. His talk eventually got to his new passion – merging his multimedia heritage with social networks, creating what he calls ‘digital lifestyle aggregators.’

Marc Cantor “I believe that every single brand wants to have an audience relationship with us. Not now but within 10 years. Nowadays the notion is about digital lifestyle aggregate. Three fundamental principles. First is integration…if you could have your IM, with your blogging with your social network with your shopping all in one interface that would be an integrated environment, easier to use. Second, aggregation. Bringing all your information into one place. Third…customisation…”

He loves the word convergence and hates labels, especially Web 3.0, his focus is close to my heart and that is transparent interoperability between social networks and technology – a long uphill battle. In fact I had asked a similar question of Dr Yoo of Cyworld, could MySpace and Cyworld and all the other ‘profile’ based SocioNets ever be compatible so you can move info around instead of endless maintenance of all of them. Dr Yoo said extremely difficult, Marc Canter has the energy to at least trigger some strong thinking in the area it seemed. Brian Seth-Hurst as usual moderated the session and a quote will follow.

Video super panel TV 2.0 Meets Web 2.0
This was almost a clone of last years panel which was one of the better ones but with the addition of a comical Steve Billinger (now leading CBC Digital) and a more serious Henrik Werdelin (of the new kid on the block Joost). It had Mr Google UK Patrick Walker there representing the big brother, the black hole and lots of jokes about them buying the rest of the panel at some point.

Ken Rutkowski (moderator) “Google literally trying to take over everything from the desktop etc: and not in a negative way, a postive way, Everyone used to call Google a search engine it doesn’t even resemble a search engine anymore, there is so much content that is out there. How do you now take advertisers and help them get their brand in front of everyone. For example on YouTube there is no advertisement inside the video, like Revver does something that is post-roll, and others are doing similar things. Where do you highlight an advertiser inside the content?”
Patrick Walker (Google) “ Well the advertising business is based on the ad words, the websearch side of things. It is a very robust business and we share a lot of revenue with partners. We are also introducing new forms of advertising looking how to play video ads, display ads on 3rd party websites. Were experimenting we have a very successful and major business thanks to the partnerships we have with advertisers and websites. So we are able to experiment on websites like Google maps and websites like YouTube where we don’t want to rush in and throw in a bunch of ad formats that maximise revenue but destroy the user experience. We have an engagement model that comes with advertising and so we will slowly introduce ads, we will experiment and get user feedback. At the end of the day if you can deliver ads that are relevant and are interesting and specific geographically then that itself becomes interesting content”.

But the panel showed that things are maturing very quickly and I pointed out that Patrick and Andy Grumbridge (Managing Editor C4 UK) were sat next to each other and asked about my tipping point observation that Google ad sales are now ahead of C4s. Andy kind of resigned to the writing on the ‘bottom line’ saying that C4 were still good at doing video ads so will be around, albeit ‘never’ again to overtake Google.

Gary “It is interesting that Andy and Patrick are sitting together C4 and Google because I think it was this time last year when for the first time in history Google ad sales were bigger than Channel 4 and it sent shockwaves running through the industry. I am just wondering if you see that as some kind of tipping point?”
Andy “We are quite good at doing video ads so we think that’s a good opportunity to get back in the game. I am not sure we will ever be as good as Google again. What was interesting though was that was achieved not through video advertising but through ad keyword display”

The panel talked again long and hard about ad funded video, the tidal wave of viewer created and the difference between aggregators and content makers. I will follow with some quotes below that tackle some of these head on. I mustn’t forget the final speaker Anthony Lilley, CEO, Magic Lantern Productions and William Linders, Executive Director Digital Media, Endemol who represented the content side of the discussion.


The virtual world keynote from Phil ‘I-try-to-be-a-reluctant-benign-God’ Rosedale” – a 101 for the fascinated hoarde.
We had to put up with this strange passport style image of Philip all week starring at us from various promo billboards around the palais – but it seemed to draw interest and it was a packed hall for this keynote. I had had a quick chat with Phil at the Emmy’s about things such as branded registrations into Second Life and the national mix but his talk to this noob audience was really a quick intro combined with some good metaphors about why SL is significant. The most poignent and resonant point he made (again for me at least!) was about real time, collaborative communication – Second Life represents people being online in the same space at the same time in a user generated environment (vs the abstracted’ness of 2D web interfaces, time shifted comments via blogs, or time shifted edits on wikis and so on).

Phil Rosedale “Nobody jumps into a new medium as an organised controlled strategy where their trying to deploy business advantaged content on that platform, it never happens. A bunch of virtual reality companies were too early in the 80s and 90s simply approached the space, the whole idea wrong. All new mediums, instant messaging, the web itself, email, television they started with whimsy, fantasy, vanity, artistic self-expression, they didn’t start with business applications, they didn’t start by trying to market real world products”

A packed crowd in the Esterel Auditorium therefore had a basic intro to Second Life and it was a shame they didn’t see the thousands of other things it represents and why Phil had to pull out images of Angshe yet again? – money talks I suppose. He did mention the many developers that are around to hand hold potential brands and TV properties into SL (including MUVEDesign of course) but referred specifically to Millions of Us and Reuben Steiger in the panel following.

“Second Life is still hard to use on a lot of machines doesn’t run well on a lot of laptops. Open sourcing was a big piece of this, were building out our team as we become profitable and are able to get many more engineers working on R&D on this. Expect Second Life to run a lot smoother, it should just work like a browser” Phil Rosedale

More significantly he was asked about the User Creation percentage referring to the 1% creation and 99% voyeur on YouTube…

“This is a point that the world of broadcast medium is really something to really think carefully about. When we started with Second Life, of course everyone spent all their time making things. Well the reason for that was the world was basically a sand block with palm trees, so if you wanted a house you better, make a primitive and paint it and sit there with your friend, it was the only thing to do. We always said as this matures as Second Life gets mainstream, whatever that means, we will see that number drop down. We looked at the number about 2 years ago when Second Life was 25 times smaller and about 30% of peoples time was spent making stuff. Now we have grown more than an order of magnitude and guess what the percentage is now, about 30%. I suggest this is the reason. We believe that people want to be entertained by passively consuming content, we have always believed that. I think that this is one of those cases where we are mistaken in why we believe that. We think because it is in human nature , most people just want to sit and be entertained, I think that is wrong. I think what we are missing is that in the past 50 years the only way we have been able to distribute great content to people is by a centralised, single point distribution mechanism which reduced costs to a reasonably point. So we believe we are passive entertainment consumers only because technology has let us do it that way. If people want to be creative 30% of the time then everyone had better rethink the nature of media and what that means”


Here we see Phil showing the audience his inworld identity – I was thinking at the time shouting out that ‘hey, you should get a good skin and hair, your embarrasing the hardcore avatars” (he looks like a noob for the uninitiated) 😉 But he made some introductory remarks about the nature of identity in Second Life and the usual audience ‘gasps’ when he started to fly, yawn, but hey all they had seen up to that point was him rezzing a bunch of powerpoint slides on the beach! Even so I had lots of folk say later ‘ooh we must buy an island and do x, y and z’ – and as usual I had to point out that certain of those things were not the most engaging for an SL audience, which was excellently covered in the next panel.

One statement from Phil that brought another few gasps was his rather matter of fact way he delivered the following line when Ken asked him about his role within the world, president, dictator?

Ken Rutkowski “Your the president of Linden Lab and so there are several million people in this environment, so are you the president…of this world? Are you seen as a president, a dictator, what are you?”

Phil Rosedale. “Depends on the day or the nature of the last software release…I try to be a reluctant benign god within the virtual world.” (sniggers from the audience) He tried to justify this statement “Theres a deeper point there. Second Life could not be successful if it were centrally controlled. If our position was that of editorial content arbiter for example I can guarantee you that it would not be as successful” and added earlier “We dont make deals directly with broadcasters or content owners; were a level-playing field platform”

Marketing in Virtual Worlds

Promised to be a great panel but I think a concentration on just Second Life and not on other less immersive avatar based psuedo 3D services would have been better. Even so we got great insight from BMW (Jens Monsees) and Millions of Us CEO Reuben Steiger gave an inspirational look at human evolution and why we are moving into virtual worlds – a proper quote to follow but he talked about the basic human need to build and make things, rather than passively consume media.

Reuben Steiger “What we say to brands coming into Second Life one of the first things we say is you have to be culturally relevant. Secondly brands need to relinquish control. Very tightly scripted, formulaic experiences don’t work they miss the mark completely…Brands need to embrace an element of user creation and chaos and the brands role is to really set the stage around their brand but to give users things to do and ways to change their experience – to give pens to their users. The brand has to write the first page of the first scene and its up to the brand to have the bravery to hand pens to their audience and let them write the rest. That is the only way to be successful.”

He also had a good array of what brands and properties should be creating for the community of Second Life – like Phil Rosedale before him tripping off the standard line ‘you must add value to the community’. I added in a question at the end that brands/properties MUST be prepared to put a lot of effort into post build with human resources too, everyone agreed. Other speakers and more quotations, especially from BMW’s experience of the virtual society to follow below..

“Our typical campaign the results are very very dramatic. Within second life our average client will get between 30 and 50 thousand users over a three month period, coming into direct contact with the brand. For our clients that is a rounding error they don’t think in terms of these numbers. Here’s where it gets interesting. The average engagement ranges from 20 minutes to 5 hours! That’s off the charts. If they do it in the way were describing it here that’s imaginative and user generated and somewhat chaotic, the experience leaves Second Life and the conversation moves into the blogosphere, they take photos of themselves interacting with the brand and upload them to flickr, movies to YouTube, Impressions in the blogosphere are between 1 to 10 million the same as in mainstream media. So the experience happens in Second Life with a core community and all the reach is on the net”. Reuben Steiger, CEO Millions of US

Eileen Bastianelli, Managing Director, Shake Content/BBDO (France)
Bas Verhart, CEO, Media Republic Development (The Netherlands)

Games for Cross-Platform Entertainment
(I can see people shifting down to gate C3 so will just quickly type a few lines to be developed later). This panel really stood out against the rest of the more integrated (for TV folk panels). Deftly and expertly led by Matt Costello (who had too many things to contribute to really be a moderator) it felt though a bit too much a look ‘inside games industry’, under the bonnet and a bit disenfranchising for TV folk. Some were drifting out as they talked about the detail of games design and not really about true cross-platform integration but Matt did mention some interesting parallel and cross-over, mixed reality formats between shows and virtual worlds that caught my ear (especially as I am involved in a few both in LAMP and in the commercial sector).

Deborah Todd “With CSI the people who worked on the game, the developers, they had their own writers but they worked very closely with the CSI writers in LA. So yes it does make sense (to integrate the show writers into the game production). The gaming world is very collaborative and I think it makes a lot of sense for us to get as much input from people as possible. But just because you have somebody who is familiar with the show doesn’t mean they can think in a non-linear fashion. Its very dangerous to think that your script writer on the show is going to be just great at coming up with your game. There are design elements that come into play, character development and sometimes you have to create backstory, puzzles, things for players to do etc:. It is better at this point in time to hire someone who has that capability and who can hit the ground running”

Most of the focus though was on sticking the game on different platforms rather than parallel or linked services. Also, although they broached it slightly, they missed the chance to talk about cost effective it is to enter customisable MMO’s like Second Life for new entrants – after all there are plenty of MMORPG like worlds inside Second Life (Midian, COLA etc) and no one even mentioned the L Word or Laguna Beach as TV property brand examples. Anyway Matt and Gina Jackson (Head of Business Development: New Media, Eidos Interactive Ltd.) and the knowledgeable Deborah Todd, (Independent designer, writer, producer) kept the hardcore games folk happy – just a shame it was over the heads of many there. More detail to follow…

Tools creating new media forms
A great idea for a panel but at the start there should have been a real overview and context as to what we were about to see and their relevances and scope! More to follow – here are the speakers
Mark Bole, CEO, Shozu ( USA)
Justin Bovington, Creative Director, Rivers Run Red Europe (UK)
Suranga Chandratillake, CTO & Founder, Blinkx (USA)
Olivier Dufour, CEO, SkemA (France)
Petteri Koponen, Co-founder, Jaiku Ltd (Finland)
Claire Leproust, VP Marketing & Content, Eyeka (France)

Lifestyle media future panel
Must admit to falling asleep for a bit in this one only to be awakened by a power cut (a Milia first? – perhaps as the produced Zapping Show was being rehearsed upstairs)…here are the panellists for now and another quote from Marc Canter who really was the only forward looking speaker…

Marc Canter, CEO, Broadband Mechanics Inc.(USA)
Eyal Hertzog, Founder and Chief Product Officer, Metacafe Inc. (USA)
Joe Michaels, Senior Director, Entertainment Business Development, MSN, Microsoft Corporation (USA)
Joanna Shields, President, International, Bebo UK Ltd (EMEA)
Michael Werber, Managing Director, FiveWorks GmbH (Germany)

Marc Canter “One thing that it is important for the crowd here to understand is that the other fundamental shift that’s happening is that the traditional world of media puts themselves in the middle. Theyre the copyright holders, theyre the investors, theyre the company…they are important, the paraparazzi shoot them and that’s the centre of their universe. They have this concept of customers, they will take what we give them. That’s pretty much mainstream media. Now I want you to flip it. I want you to imagine that the number one most important thing is actually your customers. Imagine that I/me are the most important thing. The number two most important thing are my friends and family. They are the people I care about, consumers don’t care about a company. In fact we should not even call them consumers, they are not ‘born to buy’. Think of this as concentric circles. You are in the centre, then friends and family surround that and finally the brands and companies surround these people, trying to reach into their pockets to turn them into consumers…technology and the software that runs on it is social…and people are the most important thing.”

Zapping Show
The closing ceremony of Milia (vs Mip) as the 360 pitching folk, eight teams this year, are given their big cardboard checks and a development deal. The show itself was not as good as last year mainly because the 30 sec pitches were a bad idea – listening to 24+ of these was tiring especially as they all came out very vague and samey after a while. Would have been much better to have a few visuals and something about the personality of the teams. Ray Cookes was his usual cheeky Cockney self but the highlight of the evening for me was when Jackie Turnure won the Ogilvy/AMEX pitching comp (really the hardest category being overtly advertorial) – she seemed genuinely surprised to win, but very well deserved as the project, a Diamond Heist ARG, has most potential. Other notables was Paul Bennun (from Something Else – and a mentor in Tasmania for us in a few weeks) and a LAMP alumni Kate Crosse who was showing off the Deep Sleep project, which I believe would have won the BBC award had she not been Australian. Shame.


(The plane is being called now!) I will provide more feedback on the 360 pitching comp later, why dont they have WiFi in economy class ;-( But I will talk about Patou Nuytemans from OgilvyOne Worldwide and others comments about the process on the Friday morning review session later too…Phew, now wheres my boarding card!!

Posted by Gary Hayes ©2007

Apr 082006

Of the nineteen, yes 19, presentations I attended at this years Milia my favourite must have been the Mobility and Content: Entertainment Everywhere! Held in the Esterel on Thursday morning – this panel seemed to cover all the main emerging media issues with ease, not tied down to a specific theme they handled the revolution without resorting to too much retrospect. The other two panels in this area, MobiWars and Developing Cross-Platform content I refer to briefly below.

Mobility and Content was excellently set-up and moderated (in a flowing vs sequential way) by Jessica Sandin (Fathom Partners) and the particular combination of Patrick Walker (Google), Ilkka Raiskinen (Nokia), Paul Bennun (Somethin’ Else) and Gerard Grech (France Telecom) had most bases covered – content, search, telcos and mobile.

It didn’t get too toys-for-boys, gadget talk and I include a few quotes from the presenters from my audio notes.

Jessica Sandin 190 million broadband connections,

“Apple has fuelled the awareness of portable digital content…look at the figures in some more detail 42 million iPods by January,2006 1 billion songs via iTunes…23 songs per device, maybe iTunes not as big as we think…3 million video capable iPods equates to around 5 videos per device…but Apple has created an awareness about portable digital content….Looking at the whole mobile industry, mobile phones 2 billion, 42 million iPods, 50 million PSP’s not all are multimedia enabled – only around 4% are 3G…the jury is still out on how successful mobile entertainment will be.”

Has convergence happened or is it hype?

Paul Bennun ©Gary HayesPaul Bennun “The last time I came to Cannes I came to Milia. This it is MipTV featuring Milia so if you believe in the genius of the market convergence has happened”

Patrick Walker (after polling the audience) “Its definitely happening and it has been happening for a long time. We are all here representing companies that are reactive and proactive in serving consumer needs and they are demanding it, an exciting space to be in…the difference between then and now is that we are entering what I would call the perfect storm, bandwidth is increasing, the cost of bandwidth and devices are decreasing and the rights holders are being more flexible about delivering across platforms…”

There was a significant amount of obligatory discussion about reformatting and relevance to cross media devices and their strengths. This included talk about length of linear content, the associated ads and how many different versions you need to make. Ilkka from Nokia chirped in”

“I echo what is said early but will add some more data points. We have been running mobile TV pilots globally now and have received final results from four of the pilots, Spain, Finland, UK and France. Whats interesting is that the average viewing time is pretty stable at around 20 plus minutes per day…so as a content provider you need to optimise your portfolio to that experience. Also interesting is that it adds to the consumption patterns. Typically on TV you have the morning and evening TV peak and the mobile ad opportunities in-between to take advantage of that and it puts pressure on your content and services…”

Gerard Grech (France Telecom) “Talking about different formats for different devices a good example is when we did a recent sports event. We had HiDef MP4 on IPTV, then on PC with windows media and we had it streamed on packet video on mobile phones. The experience was different given the device that the consumer was accessing the content. On IPTV we had a very interesting mosaic with different camera angles, on mobile we had the highlights because we knew people were snacking and wanted to know what the score was and on PC it was between the two, people like to browse, read what other people have been saying about the game more community features…your formatting the content and what you wrap around the content to different devices and that is something you need to think about…if you propose something to an operator like us…think about what you offer but what else you offer in addition to that”

Then things got a little more interesting when distribution rights appeared in the discussion: a panellist came out with the standard “content once its created wants to go everywhere” Paul Bennun replied:

“over reliance on DRM is creating customer confusion, it means I can get it on this device and not that device, at this price point here and this one there…it is massively confusing, its massively restrictive and it is stunting the market, the way DRM is currently being deployed does not work.”

The metaphor of boats sailing by – that we are locking down content too restrictively and consumers are looking elsewhere turned into these being pirate boats and un-controlled super distribution. All panellists agreed that some content should be given away free, now particularly advertising full content. Illkka lightened the discussion with an exercise in definitions

“…different platforms with different rules. This is not a sustainable situation. I have been discussing with several people, what is this device (holding a Nokia N92, mobile TV, phone) is this a mobile phone or a mobile TV and then depending on what we decide there will be different rules….in different countries, different rules, historically we have attached rules to different distribution mechanisms…that whole paradigm is changing, consumers do not believe they are buying the content for the platform, they believe they are buying it for themselves. If that angle is not part of the discussion in how we solve this then we are creating a kind of priest-like ‘ohh this is a mobile tv, this is a phone’ it is going to be really really stupid”

The discussion moved via Google into people power, consumers driving prices and user generated content. Consumers will create stuff they want if we, the media, do not, because they can now. Google said their role is to simply facilitate this, suggesting I felt with or without the so-called professional media makers.

I asked a question about a converged device and what might be a common format device in the future, a communications device that acts as your mobile PVR with a few hundred GB of storage and can dock to larger screens, all your personal, vlog, feature film and TV content (they/we want content they own in their/our hand) – used my old iPod content-to-go model combined with mobile phone…Patrick from Google replied

patrick walker ©Gary Hayes “I would love one of those. You made a really important point when you talk about portability, mobility, you said dock it to the TV right. How many people have an iPod and have docked it to their stereo to get a higher fidelity sound at home or in a hotel? (All audience raise hands) See. You have really got to think about portability in terms of circumstance…storage devices are getting much less expensive. The storage for the PSP was more expensive than the device originally, that will change, the ability to store and take as long as the device has upgradable memory”

Illkka then did a sales act on me and said they have a dockable TV device using ORB to share and move content around via WiFi. Very cheap. Paul then pointed out the fact that automatically you can use RSS to capture content via bit torrent that will sync to your iPod completely illegally and many people are doing this already. Circumvents all business models being discussed in other panels. The boats are again leaving…the discussion went on in a lively way referring to mash-ups and the value of UGC etc:

Another panel in a similar domain was Mobiwars – content owners through to telcos and mobile virtual network operators…Mark Halper a Freelance Journalist had a few interesting opening tips and moderated a difficult panel very effectively. This one was how content producers can get money without going through a mobile operator portal:

1 – Distributing via text message, direct download
2 – Your own mobile portal – delivered via a mobile friendly website
3 – MVNO, mobile virtual network operator, rent mobile capacity to sell your content
4 – Rent wholesale access to networks – sell content at a fixed fee (not traffic fee)
5 – Transferring content via PC to phone
6 – WiFi signals,
7 – Using broadcast signals to get content to handsets
8 – Advertising sponsored content, without or within the operator portal

Overall the mobile TV, VOD panels suggested there is a great deal of confusion in the market highlighted by Ilkka from Nokia who said old distribution business models are being broken down and consumers are circumventing these in the market. What fun it is in the grey zone of media transition 😉

Posted by Gary Hayes ©2006